<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ask Your Link Partners For Another Link</title>
	<atom:link href="http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/ask-your-link-partners-for-another-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/ask-your-link-partners-for-another-link/</link>
	<description>Link &#38; Content Exchange</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:01:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/ask-your-link-partners-for-another-link/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 13:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/?p=23#comment-32</guid>
		<description>I find it hard to imagine that they&#039;d ignore all but one link site-wide. Perhaps they meant that if there&#039;s more than one link from one page to another, they ignore all but one. Maybe even if there&#039;s more than one link from one site to another page, though even that would seem a little odd. But all but one link from an entire site to an entire other site? That would discount the value of so many legitimate links that it&#039;s difficult to imagine they&#039;d do that.

Glad you&#039;re getting good use our of CaRP Evolution.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to imagine that they&#8217;d ignore all but one link site-wide. Perhaps they meant that if there&#8217;s more than one link from one page to another, they ignore all but one. Maybe even if there&#8217;s more than one link from one site to another page, though even that would seem a little odd. But all but one link from an entire site to an entire other site? That would discount the value of so many legitimate links that it&#8217;s difficult to imagine they&#8217;d do that.</p>
<p>Glad you&#8217;re getting good use our of CaRP Evolution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gerry</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/ask-your-link-partners-for-another-link/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>Gerry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 08:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/?p=23#comment-31</guid>
		<description>Hi Antone,

I read somewhere that Google ignores all but one of the links when there are multiple links to one website on another. I&#039;m not sure but I think it was in a Stompernet email that I saw it.
What&#039;s your take on it?

BTW Carp Evolution rocks. I have had it for years now and it works great.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Antone,</p>
<p>I read somewhere that Google ignores all but one of the links when there are multiple links to one website on another. I&#8217;m not sure but I think it was in a Stompernet email that I saw it.<br />
What&#8217;s your take on it?</p>
<p>BTW Carp Evolution rocks. I have had it for years now and it works great.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
