<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Picking the Right Tags For Your Feeds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/picking-the-right-tags-for-your-feeds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/picking-the-right-tags-for-your-feeds/</link>
	<description>Link &#38; Content Exchange</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:01:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/picking-the-right-tags-for-your-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 16:11:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=17#comment-21</guid>
		<description>This raises an interesting question: if the search engines think your site is about one thing, but then you start getting links from pages about something else, do the search engines say &quot;oh, it must NOT be about that, it must be about this&quot;, or do they say &quot;oh, it must be about BOTH this AND that&quot;?

In other words, can a page be optimized for multiple keywords, without the one hurting the other?

If not, then you&#039;re right to stick to your primary keywords and avoid getting optimized for anything else.

If you CAN optimize for multiple keywords, you may still be right -- the question then is whether you&#039;ll benefit more ON THIS SITE by going after the lower-traffic keywords that you want to optimize for the most, or whether it would be better to target less specific exchanges with potentially higher volume.

Thoughts, anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This raises an interesting question: if the search engines think your site is about one thing, but then you start getting links from pages about something else, do the search engines say &#8220;oh, it must NOT be about that, it must be about this&#8221;, or do they say &#8220;oh, it must be about BOTH this AND that&#8221;?</p>
<p>In other words, can a page be optimized for multiple keywords, without the one hurting the other?</p>
<p>If not, then you&#8217;re right to stick to your primary keywords and avoid getting optimized for anything else.</p>
<p>If you CAN optimize for multiple keywords, you may still be right &#8212; the question then is whether you&#8217;ll benefit more ON THIS SITE by going after the lower-traffic keywords that you want to optimize for the most, or whether it would be better to target less specific exchanges with potentially higher volume.</p>
<p>Thoughts, anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kent Website Design</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/picking-the-right-tags-for-your-feeds/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Kent Website Design</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 15:10:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=17#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Hi Antone,

Its my feed. I can see your point, yes. But considering the ideal scenario is people picking up a feed that is relative to both people and ideally the right keywords, so the feed benefits from the link backs. However, in my situation, &quot;small business blogging&quot; isnt what i want to optimise my site for. I guess the way around that is to post general feeds but with my choosen anchor text in the blog article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Antone,</p>
<p>Its my feed. I can see your point, yes. But considering the ideal scenario is people picking up a feed that is relative to both people and ideally the right keywords, so the feed benefits from the link backs. However, in my situation, &#8220;small business blogging&#8221; isnt what i want to optimise my site for. I guess the way around that is to post general feeds but with my choosen anchor text in the blog article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
