<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The PageRank Myth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/</link>
	<description>Link &#38; Content Exchange</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 11:01:24 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 02:24:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-61</guid>
		<description>Sure, all other things being equal, higher PageRank is better. All I&#039;m saying is that many people focus too much on PageRank AT THE EXPENSE OF MORE IMPORTANT FACTORS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, all other things being equal, higher PageRank is better. All I&#8217;m saying is that many people focus too much on PageRank AT THE EXPENSE OF MORE IMPORTANT FACTORS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlanta moving</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-60</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlanta moving</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-60</guid>
		<description>All things being equal does it not still hold true that if you have an relevant anchor text link from a site of say pr3 (that has relevant information on it&#039;s site) compared to another site that also has relevant content with the same anchor text link with pr6.  Will google still give the pr6 anchor text link more weight (assuming both sites have relative content)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All things being equal does it not still hold true that if you have an relevant anchor text link from a site of say pr3 (that has relevant information on it&#8217;s site) compared to another site that also has relevant content with the same anchor text link with pr6.  Will google still give the pr6 anchor text link more weight (assuming both sites have relative content)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Računovodstvo</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-58</link>
		<dc:creator>Računovodstvo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 17:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-58</guid>
		<description>I still think PageRank is more or less important. When I make links from pages with higher PR (4 or more) this still has big imapct on SERP. Not all of these links, but most of all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think PageRank is more or less important. When I make links from pages with higher PR (4 or more) this still has big imapct on SERP. Not all of these links, but most of all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-50</guid>
		<description>This list is a bigger secret than the Krabby Patty formula. If Google released it, thousands of black hat SEOs would use it to devise new ways of cheating.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This list is a bigger secret than the Krabby Patty formula. If Google released it, thousands of black hat SEOs would use it to devise new ways of cheating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: optimizacija</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>optimizacija</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 19:23:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-49</guid>
		<description>I would like to know what are those 200+ factors that impact on PR ? Is there a list?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to know what are those 200+ factors that impact on PR ? Is there a list?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Turn Every Page of Your Blog Into a Link Exchange? &#187; White Hat Crew</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Turn Every Page of Your Blog Into a Link Exchange? &#187; White Hat Crew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 18:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-25</guid>
		<description>[...] written about the PageRank question on one of my other blogs. Executive summary: stop freaking out about &#8220;bleeding&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] written about the PageRank question on one of my other blogs. Executive summary: stop freaking out about &#8220;bleeding&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Antone Roundy</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-23</link>
		<dc:creator>Antone Roundy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-23</guid>
		<description>Well, it&#039;s not that PageRank is DEAD, it&#039;s just far less important than it used to be and not worthy of the rabid focus that many place on it.

Incoming links are still critical, it&#039;s just that they have to be higher quality links than before.

You want to build links in a way that not only builds PageRank, but also builds relevance and trust -- you want those links to come from pages with content on the same topic as yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, it&#8217;s not that PageRank is DEAD, it&#8217;s just far less important than it used to be and not worthy of the rabid focus that many place on it.</p>
<p>Incoming links are still critical, it&#8217;s just that they have to be higher quality links than before.</p>
<p>You want to build links in a way that not only builds PageRank, but also builds relevance and trust &#8212; you want those links to come from pages with content on the same topic as yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Where to link</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator>Where to link</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 16:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-22</guid>
		<description>Just wondering what to work on now that pagerank has died.  Do you just focus on the content of your site and Keyword density?  Finding the right approach is very difficult for a self learner these days.  

My focus will turn to only reading material that is within 3 months of the current date.  I have waisting much time on Pagerank over the last month with reading old articles about Pagerank.  Mistake!

Time to move my focus away from PageRank. 

Thanks for the article.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wondering what to work on now that pagerank has died.  Do you just focus on the content of your site and Keyword density?  Finding the right approach is very difficult for a self learner these days.  </p>
<p>My focus will turn to only reading material that is within 3 months of the current date.  I have waisting much time on Pagerank over the last month with reading old articles about Pagerank.  Mistake!</p>
<p>Time to move my focus away from PageRank. </p>
<p>Thanks for the article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: http://GrapeGrowerWineMaker.com</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>http://GrapeGrowerWineMaker.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Page Rank is highly relevant to just one thing - the price you can command for advertising space.

Search engine traffic to a page is determined by key phrase ranking.  So the question folks should rightly be concerned about how to maximize and protect their keyword ranking.  

Thus concerns about bleeding page rank might usefully be restated as &quot;does the proposed action bleed keyword rank?&quot;  

It may surprise some to discover that if the outbound link reinforces the keyword relevance of the page, then it may actually help rather than hinder the page&#039;s keyword rank.

Google goes to some lengths to reward actions that positively enrich the user experience.  So think &quot;trust&quot; and &quot;relevance&quot;.

In the immortal words of Donald Sutherland - &quot;have a little faith, Moriarty - and get over Page Rank!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Page Rank is highly relevant to just one thing &#8211; the price you can command for advertising space.</p>
<p>Search engine traffic to a page is determined by key phrase ranking.  So the question folks should rightly be concerned about how to maximize and protect their keyword ranking.  </p>
<p>Thus concerns about bleeding page rank might usefully be restated as &#8220;does the proposed action bleed keyword rank?&#8221;  </p>
<p>It may surprise some to discover that if the outbound link reinforces the keyword relevance of the page, then it may actually help rather than hinder the page&#8217;s keyword rank.</p>
<p>Google goes to some lengths to reward actions that positively enrich the user experience.  So think &#8220;trust&#8221; and &#8220;relevance&#8221;.</p>
<p>In the immortal words of Donald Sutherland &#8211; &#8220;have a little faith, Moriarty &#8211; and get over Page Rank!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ</title>
		<link>http://LinContEx.com/the-missing-link/the-pagerank-myth/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 14:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lincontex.com/the-missing-link/?p=11#comment-18</guid>
		<description>I think that PageRank should be an item that you pay attention to. It should be another detail you sort of track. Why? If your PR suddenly drops from PR4 to PR0.... I would want to investigate what is going on and why this happened. Just another variable in your SEO quest</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that PageRank should be an item that you pay attention to. It should be another detail you sort of track. Why? If your PR suddenly drops from PR4 to PR0&#8230;. I would want to investigate what is going on and why this happened. Just another variable in your SEO quest</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
